« Ed Koch Commentary: The Chavez Handshake, Cuba, and the Release of the Torture Memos By Edward I. Koch | Main | When Is a Fee a Bribe? By Henry J. Stern »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8345159b169e201156f3cb22a970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Dan Schorr's Covention Acceptance Speech (Two Parts):
You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.
The comments to this entry are closed.
Share your perspective by calling the program
(347) 205-9201
Monday - Friday · 10am - 12pm
Provide us with your name and email address and we will send the Breaking News right to your inbox. No spam, just news, we promise!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: ROW YOUR BOAT ASHORE | April 21, 2009 at 09:25
Where do i get my bumber sticker? Where can I send my donation?
We need a District Attorney in this county who takes crime seriously and backs up the Police in this county.
This guy ecen sounds like he wants to put criminals in jail. DiFiore should have tried that
Posted by: Mr. Snerdly | April 21, 2009 at 10:44
Mr. Snerdly is right in that law enforcement can't stand DiFiore. But she still should destroy Zherka and Blassberg's front man Castro in the primary. Then hopefully Schorr can somehow win the general.
Posted by: Anon | April 21, 2009 at 11:38
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: ROW YOUR BOAT ASHORE | April 21, 2009 at 12:16
schorr cannot win the general..as you know a republican needs three lines to even
have a chance..and castro is getting the IND line...its funny that some people accuse difiore of NOT backing the police..while others insist she is in their pockets.. just remember the job of the DA..is to fairly prosecute crimes....that is why charging decisions are initially made by the cops but the final word is the da's..and she cannot be a rubber stamp
Posted by: little red rh | April 21, 2009 at 12:32
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: ROW YOUR BOAT ASHORE | April 21, 2009 at 12:55
I think that there will be a huge pro-Republican turnout in the polls this November in response to The Democrats Trillion dollar spending bill, Obama's letting out all of the CIA's secrets on enhanced interrogation, and the imminent terrorist attack we will suffer in the next 6 months due to the Presidents political impotence.
Posted by: Damn Sure! | April 21, 2009 at 12:56
You should go back and check the voting patterns and registration...if there is
a terrorist attack godforbid , Americans will rally around their president...Democrats out number republicans by 110,000 voters in westchester...if dan schorr gets the IND line he might have
a good chance..but Julio Cavalooooooooo is in bed with sam zherka on this race..so
dan can kiss any chance he had good-bye. DA is a line race…County Exec people Think about…DA’s run like judges…Exec’s have power over taxes…DA’s Don;’t…Difiore was a Judge she won in Westchester…then as a republican She beat a democrat in Westchester..now as a democrat she obviously Will win for the third time..
Posted by: little red rh | April 21, 2009 at 13:08
Row Your Boat Ashore ought to beach it. Those posts are annoying over and over again. Moronic.
Little Red ought to consider that it's possible the only endorsing Cavallo will be doing is perhaps that of a bail bondsman. That may be known pretty soon.
There could be a big Republican (and even moderate Democrat) backlash against not only Obama and the Democratic Congress, but also against Paterson, Spitzer before him, and the Dem majorities in Albany who are soaking the taxpayers with a monstrous tax and spend budget. NY State is in big, big trouble, and the Democrats are in charge. That backlash may happen.
Posted by: Son of Skittles | April 21, 2009 at 14:03
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: KEEP US SAFE | April 21, 2009 at 14:42
son of skittles is quite right..there may indeed be a backlash..but it will hurt
andy spano since he is in a position to raise taxes...voters who are democratic
will leave the line once but they won't stay there..an incumbant DA with a party
Registration edge as large as DiFiore‘s has never lost…Dan Schorr is a nice Guy but his only qualification is serving as an assistant DA..no bureau Chief experience at all…ie no administrative experience..so DiFiore Notwithstanding her party switch will not only get half the republicans
Who voted for her last time because they really don’t care about party And all of the democrats because she is one…and most of the Independents Because they didn‘t care about party affilation in the first place.The Cavalo attempt to influence the election will be exposed for what
It is…his connection to zherka, blassberg and the guardian..his Connection to Allesandro, etc. .
Posted by: little red rh | April 21, 2009 at 15:13
We need new faces and will take our chances that they will make a change.
Do not forget the tea parties that took place all across America, because all parties are tired of the same old crap.
Posted by: Anonymoose | April 21, 2009 at 22:29
new faces for elected officials who have taxation and budget responsibilities is
an excellent idea..dumping an experienced
da for a novice is quite another
Posted by: just the facts | April 22, 2009 at 03:25
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: KEEP US SAFE | April 22, 2009 at 09:57
now that it is clear that officer ridley's father is not the estate representative for
the deceased police officer, and it is clear that the video does not show anything close to what Lovett is alleging in his lawsuit, and now that the witness that Lovett cites in his legal papers has given the police a statement completely at odds with the lawsuit indicating that he heard but did not see the actual shooting of officer Ridley it is long past time that dan schor and tony castro spoke up and made it clear that they want to be disassociated from Lovett, his legal wilding, and blassberg's rants appearing in zherka's guardian..ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. this is a race for DA..not a circus> Both men are dishonoring The great tradition of Carl Vergari the man who made the Westchester da’s office a national Leader in modern prosecutorial techniques, victim witness services and domestic violence prosecutions
Posted by: little red | April 22, 2009 at 16:51
It now seems like a few witnesses are lying. They are changing their stories. Very bad. Very bad for Lovett too.
Lovett may be in the soup big-time. Long overdue.
Posted by: Son of Skittles | April 23, 2009 at 17:14
soup...how about the rabbit stew...his homeless witness all dressed up with no place to go first told the police one thing, then apparently told lovett another, then finally said he saw the shooting through a car window..but if you watch the video it appears that he was down ducking as he stated the first time....Ms Maravilla said "once he was down (Ridley) they didn't shoot anymore...Nobody walked up to him and put a gun to his head..they didn't take his badge they didnt do anything like Lovett is saying...I saw exactly what happened" 62 witnesses appeared before the grand jury,62 of them...and Lovett comes up with
one witness who originally states he didn’t see the shooting but simply heard it...
someone needs to explain to these supposed witnesses that perjury is a felony..and
that if they are lying they will be charged they also ought to be asked whether they
have ever spoken to sam zherka with regard to this matter...and if so what he said to
them...and finally a grievance should be filed against lovett by the officers he
is maligning. Remember you can sue for whatever amount you want..collecting is another matter
Posted by: little red rh | April 23, 2009 at 17:37
WHERE DOES DAN SCHORR STAND ON ALL OF THIS
HIS SILENCE IS DEAFANING...
Posted by: JUST THE FACTS | April 23, 2009 at 17:38
The County Police Union is threatening to sue Lovett. They should do it. And you bet, these "witnesses" should be asked if they ever met Sam Zherka, ever spoke to him, or ever received any "promises" or other consideration from him or anyone connected to him. Or from anybody at all, for that matter.
First, remind them of the consequences of perjury.
Posted by: Son of Skittles | April 23, 2009 at 21:37
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
RE-ELECT JANET DIFIORE!
Posted by: keep us safe | April 23, 2009 at 23:06